Ex parte Roberson
190 So. 2d 566, 43 Ala. App. 354, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 518
This text of 190 So. 2d 566 (Ex parte Roberson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ex parte Roberson, 190 So. 2d 566, 43 Ala. App. 354, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 518 (Ala. Ct. App. 1966).
Opinion
This is an original action for mandamus.
Petitioner sought post conviction review while he still had time to take a direct appeal. The circuit court correctly dismissed his petition for coram nobis.
Mandamus is not a substitute for an appeal.
The petition on its face requires that it be and, on motion of the Attorney General, it is hereby
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
MacK v. State
288 So. 2d 150 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1974)
Daniels v. State
267 So. 2d 540 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
Vincent v. State
224 So. 2d 601 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1969)
Ex Parte Sykes
213 So. 2d 413 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1968)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
190 So. 2d 566, 43 Ala. App. 354, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-roberson-alactapp-1966.