Ex parte Roberson

190 So. 2d 566, 43 Ala. App. 354, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 518
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided September 27, 1966·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

This is an original action for mandamus.

Petitioner sought post conviction review while he still had time to take a direct appeal. The circuit court correctly dismissed his petition for coram nobis.

Mandamus is not a substitute for an appeal.

The petition on its face requires that it be and, on motion of the Attorney General, it is hereby

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Roberson, 190 So. 2d 566, 43 Ala. App. 354, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 518 (Ala. Ct. App. 1966).

190 So. 2d 566 (Ex parte Roberson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MacK v. State
288 So. 2d 150 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1974)
Daniels v. State
267 So. 2d 540 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
Vincent v. State
224 So. 2d 601 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1969)
Ex Parte Sykes
213 So. 2d 413 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1968)