Ex parte Rheude

289 S.W.2d 239, 163 Tex. Crim. 39, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 974
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 11, 1956
DocketNo. 28,205
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 289 S.W.2d 239 (Ex parte Rheude) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Rheude, 289 S.W.2d 239, 163 Tex. Crim. 39, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 974 (Tex. 1956).

Opinion

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant, relator in the trial court, petitioned Hon. Roy Biggs, Judge of the county court of Reeves County, for writ of habeas corpus, alleging that he was unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the sheriff of said county, under and by virtue of a judgment issued out of said county court as a juvenile court.

[40]*40The writ was granted and, after hearing, Judge Biggs remanded appellant to custody and from such order this appeal is prosecuted.

The order of commitment in the juvenile court found appellant to be a delinquent child and committed him to the care, control and custody of the Texas State Youth Development Council in accordance with Art. 5143c V.C.S. The judgment adjudging appellant to be a delinquent child was rendered the same day, and notice of appeal to the Texas Court of Civil Appeals of the Eighth Supreme Judicial District was given. Bond was requested in connection with both appeals.

Art. 2338-1, Sec. 21, V.C.S., provides that appeal from a judgment of a juvenile court declaring a child to be delinquent may be taken to the court of civil appeals “as in other civil cases;” that an appeal shall not suspend the order of the juvenile court nor discharge the child from custody; but that the appellate court “may provide for a recognizance bond.”

The record shows that appellant is lawfully restrained under the civil statutes herein mentioned. Any question as to the validity of the statutes, or the judgment or commitment under which appellant is held in custody is for the civil courts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hultin v. State
351 S.W.2d 248 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)
Ex parte Lumpkin
165 Tex. Crim. 628 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 S.W.2d 239, 163 Tex. Crim. 39, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-rheude-texcrimapp-1956.