Ex Parte Regional Dialysis of Anniston

480 So. 2d 1229, 1985 Ala. LEXIS 4232
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 8, 1985·No. 84-1280·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By denying the petition, we do not intend to be understood as agreeing that administrative agencies are restricted by the Administrative Procedure Act, §§ 41-22-1, et seq., Code 1975, to legal rules of evidence. The Act itself provides:

"[T]he rules of evidence as applied in nonjury civil cases in the circuit courts of this state shall be followed. When necessary to ascertain facts not reasonably susceptible of proof under those rules, evidence not admissible thereunder may be admitted (except where precluded by statute) if it is of a type commonly relied upon by reasonably prudent persons in the conduct of their affairs."

§§ 41-22-13, Code 1975.

We agree, however, with the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals, 480 So.2d 1226.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES and HOUSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Regional Dialysis of Anniston, 480 So. 2d 1229, 1985 Ala. LEXIS 4232 (Ala. 1985).

480 So. 2d 1229 (Ex Parte Regional Dialysis of Anniston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Huntsville Healthcare Center, Inc. v. Brown Health Services, Inc.
747 So. 2d 330 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1999)
Clark v. Fancher
662 So. 2d 258 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1995)
Sylacauga Health Care Center, Inc. v. Alabama State Health Planning Agency
662 So. 2d 265 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1994)
Nursing Home of Dothan, Inc. v. SHPA
542 So. 2d 935 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1988)