Ex parte Reese

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ex parte Reese

442 S.W.2d 397

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 25, 1969

DocketNo. 42060

StatusPublished

This text of 442 S.W.2d 397 (Ex parte Reese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex parte Reese, 442 S.W.2d 397 (Tex. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

MORRISON, Judge.

Our original opinion 'is withdrawn and the following substituted therefor.

This is an extradition proceeding. The warrant of the Governor was introduced which recited that appellant was charged with the offense of fraudulent removal, concealment, or disposition of personalty as shown by affidavit, complaint, warrant of arrest and other allied papers, including the application for requisition which recited in full Sec. 504 of the California Penal Code, creating the offense with which appellant was charged.

Appellant’s contention under Art. 51.13, sec. 3, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., that there is no showing that “an offense was committed by appellant which is extradictable under the laws of Texas” is accordingly overruled. Ex parte Key, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 524, 301 S.W.2d 90.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled, and judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

MORRISON, Judge.

Our original opinion 'is withdrawn and the following substituted therefor.

This is an extradition proceeding. The warrant of the Governor was introduced which recited that appellant was charged with the offense of fraudulent removal, concealment, or disposition of personalty as shown by affidavit, complaint, warrant of arrest and other allied papers, including the application for requisition which recited in full Sec. 504 of the California Penal Code, creating the offense with which appellant was charged.

Appellant’s contention under Art. 51.13, sec. 3, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., that there is no showing that “an offense was committed by appellant which is extradictable under the laws of Texas” is accordingly overruled. Ex parte Key, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 524, 301 S.W.2d 90.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled, and judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

442 S.W.2d 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-reese-texcrimapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack