Ex parte Reese

112 Ala. 63
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1895·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

McCLELLAN, J.

The only question in this case is whether a person proceeded against by information or complaint, charging a misdemeanor, in the county court, and who there, failing to demand a trial by jury, is duly tried and convicted, is entitled to an appeal to the circuit [or city) court without giving bond as required by section 4226 of the Code. We are opinion that the section in question is clearly within legislative competency, and therefore constitutional; -and that, of consequence a compliance with its requirements is a condition precedent to the right of appeal.

The application for mandamus is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Reese, 112 Ala. 63 (Ala. 1895).

112 Ala. 63 (Ex parte Reese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Puryear v. State Ex Rel. Wade
75 So. 704 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1917)
Alford v. State ex rel. Attorney General
54 So. 213 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910)