Ex Parte Raymond Dominic Cozzi, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 29, 2004
Docket02-04-00037-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Raymond Dominic Cozzi, Jr. (Ex Parte Raymond Dominic Cozzi, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Raymond Dominic Cozzi, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH

NO. 2-04-037-CR

 
 

EX PARTE

RAYMOND DOMINIC COZZI, JR.

 
 

------------

FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

OPINION

        Appellant Raymond Dominic Cozzi, Jr. appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing his article 11.072 application for writ of habeas corpus as moot.1  Article 11.072 provides that “the trial court shall enter a written order granting or denying the relief sought in the application.”2  An applicant may appeal from the denial of any or all relief.3  In this case, the trial court did not enter the statutorily mandated ruling but instead dismissed the application.  While Appellant could have very well filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in this court, requesting that the trial judge be ordered to rule on his application,4 he does not have the right to appeal from a dismissal of his application.5   We therefore dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

                                                                  LEE ANN DAUPHINOT
                                                                  JUSTICE

PANEL F:   LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

PUBLISH

DELIVERED: April 29, 2004


NOTES

1.  Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.072 (Vernon Supp. 2004).

2.  Id. art. 11.072, § 6(a) (emphasis added).

3.  Id. art. 11.072, § 8.

4.  See Ex parte Hargett, 819 S.W.2d 866, 868 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding); Von Kolb v. Koehler, 609 S.W.2d 654, 655-56 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1980, orig. proceeding).

5.  See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.072, § 8; Ex parte Noe, 646 S.W.2d 230, 231 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Noe
646 S.W.2d 230 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Von Kolb v. Koehler
609 S.W.2d 654 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Ex Parte Hargett
819 S.W.2d 866 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Barnes v. State
832 S.W.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Raymond Dominic Cozzi, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-raymond-dominic-cozzi-jr-texapp-2004.