Ex Parte Ray

1935 OK 273, 42 P.2d 234, 171 Okla. 154, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 121
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided March 19, 1935·No. No. 22768.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The application was filed herein August 26, 1931, and alleges that the petitioner is illegally restrained by the sheriff of Stephens county.

The state has offered no brief in this case and the court has had to satisfy itself as to the legality of the order without assistance from the county of Stephens or its proper officers. However, the application shows on its face that the court properly entered its order of commitment. See Ex parte Bowes, 8 Okla. Cr. 201, 127 P. 20, and cases following it.

The writ is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Ray, 1935 OK 273, 42 P.2d 234, 171 Okla. 154, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 121 (Okla. 1935).

1935 OK 273 (Ex Parte Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. BALKMAN
2020 OK 104 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2020)