Ex Parte Ray

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Ex Parte Ray

1935 OK 273, 42 P.2d 234, 171 Okla. 154, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 121

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 19, 1935

DocketNo. 22768.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 1935 OK 273 (Ex Parte Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Ray, 1935 OK 273, 42 P.2d 234, 171 Okla. 154, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 121 (Okla. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The application was filed herein August 26, 1931, and alleges that the petitioner is illegally restrained by the sheriff of Stephens county.

The state has offered no brief in this case and the court has had to satisfy itself as to the legality of the order without assistance from the county of Stephens or its proper officers. However, the application shows on its face that the court properly entered its order of commitment. See Ex parte Bowes, 8 Okla. Cr. 201, 127 P. 20, and cases following it.

The writ is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The application was filed herein August 26, 1931, and alleges that the petitioner is illegally restrained by the sheriff of Stephens county.

The state has offered no brief in this case and the court has had to satisfy itself as to the legality of the order without assistance from the county of Stephens or its proper officers. However, the application shows on its face that the court properly entered its order of commitment. See Ex parte Bowes, 8 Okla. Cr. 201, 127 P. 20, and cases following it.

The writ is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1935 OK 273, 42 P.2d 234, 171 Okla. 154, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-ray-okla-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack