Home/Supreme Court of Alabama/Ex Parte Ray

Ex Parte Ray

809 So. 2d 891, 2001 WL 845800
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided July 27, 2001·No. 1001192·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition, we note that the discussion by the Court of Criminal Appeals in Ray v. State, 809 So.2d 875 (Ala.Crim.App. 2001), concerning the testimony of the medical examiner and the testimony of Investigator Roy Freine is unnecessary to the resolution of the issue concerning the sufficiency of the corroborative evidence.

WRIT DENIED.

Moore, C.J., and Houston, See, Brown, Johnstone, Harwood, Woodall, and Stuart, JJ., concur.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Ray, 809 So. 2d 891, 2001 WL 845800 (Ala. 2001).

809 So. 2d 891 (Ex Parte Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. State
179 So. 3d 170 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2013)
Dominique Ray v. State of Alabama.
80 So. 3d 965 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2011)
Donald Dwayne Whatley v. State of Alabama.
146 So. 3d 437 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2010)
Adams v. State
955 So. 2d 1037 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2003)
Lewis v. State
889 So. 2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2003)
McNabb v. State
887 So. 2d 929 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2003)
Tomlin v. State
909 So. 2d 213 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2002)
Hamm v. State
913 So. 2d 460 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2002)
K.R.B. v. State
834 So. 2d 826 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2001)