Ex parte Rankin

20 S.W. 202, 30 Tex. Ct. App. 71, 1891 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 57
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 20, 1891·No. No. 7488·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The relator in this case was indicted by the grand jury of Fayette County for the murder of F. S. Homuth. Application for bail was made. Upon the hearing thereof and the evidence adduced on the trial the learned trial judge refused bail and remanded the applicant to custody. From said judgment refusing him bail the applicant prosecutes his appeal to this court.

After a careful investigation of the facts as presented to us in the record, we are of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to bail.

It would be manifestly improper for us to discuss the facts or give our reasons for the conclusions reached, in view of a trial to be had upon the indictment before a jury and on the merits of the case.

The judgment refusing the relator bail is reversed and bail is granted him in the sum of $8000, upon giving which in the manner and form prescribed by law he will be released from custody; and it is ordered accordingly.

Reversed and bail granted.

Judges all present and concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Rankin, 20 S.W. 202, 30 Tex. Ct. App. 71, 1891 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 57 (Tex. Ct. App. 1891).

20 S.W. 202 (Ex parte Rankin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beck v. State
648 S.W.2d 7 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)