Ex Parte R. Wayne Johnson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 27, 2014
Docket07-14-00384-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte R. Wayne Johnson (Ex Parte R. Wayne Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte R. Wayne Johnson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-14-00384-CR

EX PARTE R. WAYNE JOHNSON

Original Proceeding

October 27, 2014

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Relator R. Wayne Johnson, a prison inmate appearing pro se, has filed an

original proceeding in this court seeking a writ of habeas corpus. The gist of relator’s

complaint is that prison officials have wrongfully reduced his good-time credit. He seeks

our order appointing him counsel and restoring the good-time credit. We will dismiss

the proceeding for want of jurisdiction.

“Texas courts of appeals only have habeas jurisdiction in situations where a

relator’s restraint of liberty arises from a violation of an order, judgment, or decree

previously made by a court or judge in a civil case.” In re Reece, 341 S.W.3d 360, 364

n.3 (Tex. 2011) (orig. proceeding); TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (West 2004). In

other words, a court of appeals does not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal law matters. Ex parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d 586, 588 (Tex. App.—El Paso

1994, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (citing Ex parte Lewis, 663 S.W.2d 153, 154 (Tex.

App.—Amarillo 1983, orig. proceeding)). Relator’s claimed restraint of liberty concerns

eligibility for parole from a criminal sentence of confinement in the penitentiary. We

therefore lack habeas jurisdiction. See In re Welty, 07-08-0195-CV, 2008 Tex. App.

LEXIS 3276, at *2 (Tex. App.—Amarillo May 6, 2008, orig. proceeding) (per curiam,

mem. op.) (citing Ex parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d at 588) (section 22.221(d) “does not

grant this Court original jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal

proceeding”). Instead, habeas jurisdiction in criminal law matters lies with the court of

criminal appeals, the district courts, the county courts or a judge of those courts. TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.05 (West 2005).

Relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

James T. Campbell Justice

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Reece
341 S.W.3d 360 (Texas Supreme Court, 2011)
Ex Parte Hawkins
885 S.W.2d 586 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Ex Parte Lewis
663 S.W.2d 153 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte R. Wayne Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-r-wayne-johnson-texapp-2014.