Ex Parte Pruitt

1930 OK CR 94, 288 P. 351, 46 Okla. Crim. 273, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 504
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 28, 1930
DocketNo. A-6483.
StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 94 (Ex Parte Pruitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Pruitt, 1930 OK CR 94, 288 P. 351, 46 Okla. Crim. 273, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 504 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

*274 CHAPPELL, J.

Claude Pruitt, hereinafter called the petitioner, filed his petition in this court for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that he was illegally restrained of his liberty by the sheriff of Carter county, Okla.

An'examination of the record discloses that the petition fails to state facts sufficient to require the discharge of the petitioner. The writ is therefore denied.

EDWARDS,. P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1930 OK CR 94, 288 P. 351, 46 Okla. Crim. 273, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-pruitt-oklacrimapp-1930.