Ex Parte Pruitt
1930 OK CR 94, 288 P. 351, 46 Okla. Crim. 273, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 504
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ex Parte Pruitt. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 Okla. Crim. 318 →
Opinion
Claude Pruitt, hereinafter called the petitioner, filed his petition in this court for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that he was illegally restrained of his liberty by the sheriff of Carter county, Okla.
An'examination of the record discloses that the petition fails to state facts sufficient to require the discharge of the petitioner. The writ is therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex Parte Pruitt, 1930 OK CR 94, 288 P. 351, 46 Okla. Crim. 273, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 504 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).
1930 OK CR 94 (Ex Parte Pruitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.