Ex parte Proctor

Indiana Supreme Court

Ex parte Proctor

34 Ind. 64

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ex parte Proctor. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Ind. 174 →

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1870·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On a careful perusal of the evidence, we are satisfied that the prisoner, Sylvester Proctor, is entitled to be let to bail. Therefore it is considered that the judgment below, refusing the admission of the said Proctor to bail, be reversed, and that the cause be remanded, with instructions to the judge below to admit the said Proctor to bail in the sum of ten thousand dollars.

And it is ordered that this judgment be certified down immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On a careful perusal of the evidence, we are satisfied that the prisoner, Sylvester Proctor, is entitled to be let to bail. Therefore it is considered that the judgment below, refusing the admission of the said Proctor to bail, be reversed, and that the cause be remanded, with instructions to the judge below to admit the said Proctor to bail in the sum of ten thousand dollars.

And it is ordered that this judgment be certified down immediately.

Ex parte Proctor, 34 Ind. 64 (Ind. 1870).

Pincite

34 Ind. 64 (Ex parte Proctor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.