Ex Parte Powell

298 S.W. 575, 107 Tex. Crim. 648, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 547
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 12, 1927
DocketNo. 11332.
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 298 S.W. 575 (Ex Parte Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Powell, 298 S.W. 575, 107 Tex. Crim. 648, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 547 (Tex. 1927).

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, Judge. —

The appeal is from an order denying bail. Appellant is charged by complaint with the offense of murder.

Bail is a matter of right unless the evidence is clear and strong, leading a well-guarded and dispassionate judgment to the conclusion' that the offense has been committed, that the accused is the guilty agent, and that he would probably be punished capitally if the law is administered. Ex Parte Alford, 261 S. W. 1041. The testimony before us in this case does not make evident the fact that upon a trial a fair jury, considering such testimony, would likely inflict the death penalty. The state offered no proof of a motive for the killing, and as far as the record reflects the facts, the killing is apparently without an explanation. See Ex Parte Feray, 279 S. W. 470. The *649 burden is on the state to show that accused is not entitled to bail. Otherwise he is entitled to bail as a matter of right. Art. 1, Sec. 11, Constitution of Texas. The case may not have been fully developed by the state, but there being a failure to discharge the burden resting upon it, we must hold that the court committed error in denying bail.

The judgment denying bail is reversed, and bail granted in the sum of five thousand dollars. Bail granted.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex parte Krueger
391 S.W.2d 737 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1965)
Ex Parte Varnado
215 S.W.2d 165 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1948)
Ex parte Coward
170 S.W.2d 754 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1943)
Ex parte Copeland
154 S.W.2d 832 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1941)
Ex Parte Elsmore
111 S.W.2d 713 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Ex parte Zinnanti
75 S.W.2d 452 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Ex parte Adams
44 S.W.2d 713 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Ex Parte Poston
42 S.W.2d 1035 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Ex Parte Reis
33 S.W.2d 435 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Ex Parte Verner Donohoe
14 S.W.2d 848 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Ex Parte Tindall
15 S.W.2d 24 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Ex Parte Robidoux
13 S.W.2d 835 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Ex Parte Carter and Miller
9 S.W.2d 1107 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Ex parte Landers
9 S.W.2d 1109 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
298 S.W. 575, 107 Tex. Crim. 648, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-powell-texcrimapp-1927.