Ex Parte Pilot

607 So. 2d 311, 1992 WL 298098
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided October 23, 1992·No. 1911116·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The issue presented by this petition for the writ of certiorari is whether the standard of Batson v.Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), applies to a defendant in a criminal case. The Court of Criminal Appeals held that it does. 607 So.2d 306. Because the United States Supreme Court has recently answered this question in the affirmative, we affirm.

On June 18, 1992, the day after we granted review in this case, the United States Supreme Court released Georgia v.McCollum, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2348, 120 L.Ed.2d 33 (1992). In McCollum, the Court, faced with the identical issue, held:

"[T]he Constitution prohibits a criminal defendant from engaging in purposeful discrimination on the ground of race in the exercise of peremptory challenges. Accordingly, if the State demonstrates a prima facie case of racial discrimination by the defendants, the defendants must articulate a racially neutral explanation for peremptory challenges."

___ U.S. at ___, 112 S.Ct. at 2359, 120 L.Ed.2d at 51.

McCollum forecloses Pilot's argument and requires that we affirm the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and SHORES, HOUSTON and KENNEDY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Pilot, 607 So. 2d 311, 1992 WL 298098 (Ala. 1992).

607 So. 2d 311 (Ex Parte Pilot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cauley v. State
681 So. 2d 1105 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1996)
State v. Govan
439 S.E.2d 263 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1993)
Rowe v. State
625 So. 2d 1210 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1993)
Owes v. State
638 So. 2d 1383 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1993)