Ex Parte Phares

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ex Parte Phares

1945 OK CR 99, 162 P.2d 335, 81 Okla. Crim. 202, 1945 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 229

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 3, 1945

DocketNo. A-10636.

StatusPublished

This text of 1945 OK CR 99 (Ex Parte Phares) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Phares, 1945 OK CR 99, 162 P.2d 335, 81 Okla. Crim. 202, 1945 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 229 (Okla. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

JONES, J.

This action in habeas corpus is identical with that filed herein in the case of Ex parte Mills, 81 Okla. Cr. 200, 162 P. 2d 334. Phares was jointly charged with Mills in the district court of Custer county with the crime of burglary. He entered his plea of guilty to the crime and was represented by the same counsel who represented the petitioner Sterling Mills. The opinion of this court in Ex parte Mills, supra, applies to the disposition of the instant case, as the issue of entrapment sought to be raised by Phares is identical with the issue sought to be raised by the petitioner Sterling Mills.

For the reasons stated in the case of Ex parte Mills, supra, the writ of habeas corpus is denied.

BAREFOOT, P. J., concurs. DOYLE, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JONES, J.

This action in habeas corpus is identical with that filed herein in the case of Ex parte Mills, 81 Okla. Cr. 200, 162 P. 2d 334. Phares was jointly charged with Mills in the district court of Custer county with the crime of burglary. He entered his plea of guilty to the crime and was represented by the same counsel who represented the petitioner Sterling Mills. The opinion of this court in Ex parte Mills, supra, applies to the disposition of the instant case, as the issue of entrapment sought to be raised by Phares is identical with the issue sought to be raised by the petitioner Sterling Mills.

For the reasons stated in the case of Ex parte Mills, supra, the writ of habeas corpus is denied.

BAREFOOT, P. J., concurs. DOYLE, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1945 OK CR 99, 162 P.2d 335, 81 Okla. Crim. 202, 1945 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-phares-oklacrimapp-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack