Home/Supreme Court of Alabama/Ex Parte Payne

Ex Parte Payne

791 So. 2d 408, 2000 WL 1841959
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 2000
Docket1991506
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 791 So. 2d 408 (Ex Parte Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Payne, 791 So. 2d 408, 2000 WL 1841959 (Ala. 2000).

Opinion

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this court does not wish to be understood as approving the discussion or the statements of law concerning the petitioner's Brady violation claim in the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). SeeEx parte Pierce [Ms. 1981270, September 1, 2000] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala. 2000) (holding that a constitutional violation claim under Rule 32.1(a), Ala.R.Crim.P., need not meet the requirements of a "newly discovered" evidence *Page 409 claim under Rule 32.1(e), Ala.R.Crim.P.).

WRIT DENIED.

Hooper, C.J., and Cook and Lyons, JJ., concur.

Maddox, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. State
99 So. 3d 349 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2011)
Hooks v. State
21 So. 3d 772 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2008)
Payne v. Allen
539 F.3d 1297 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
Clemons v. State
55 So. 3d 314 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2005)
Brooks v. State
929 So. 2d 491 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
791 So. 2d 408, 2000 WL 1841959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-payne-ala-2000.