Ex Parte Patton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex Parte Patton

89 So. 924, 206 Ala. 700

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 21, 1921·No. 6 Div. 401.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MILLER, J.

The facts in this case are practically the same as in Ex parte Robert J. Lancaster, 89 South. 721. 1 The. questions of law in each are identical. Under the law and rulings of this court in that case, the writ of prohibition prayed for in this should issue. The petition for writ of prohibition is granted.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and GARDNER, JJ., concur.

1

Ante, p. 60.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MILLER, J.

The facts in this case are practically the same as in Ex parte Robert J. Lancaster, 89 South. 721. 1 The. questions of law in each are identical. Under the law and rulings of this court in that case, the writ of prohibition prayed for in this should issue. The petition for writ of prohibition is granted.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and GARDNER, JJ., concur.

1

Ante, p. 60.

Ex Parte Patton, 89 So. 924, 206 Ala. 700 (Ala. 1921).

Pincite

89 So. 924 (Ex Parte Patton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related