Ex Parte Patrick Bradley v. the State of Texas
This text of Ex Parte Patrick Bradley v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Patrick Bradley v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00170-CR
EX PARTE PATRICK BRADLEY
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
May 17, 2024 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Patrick Bradley, proceeding pro se, filed documents with this Court titled “Injunction
Relief in Improper Grand Jury Indictments,” requesting dismissal of his pending criminal
charges and release from incarceration. We have construed the documents as an
application for writ of habeas corpus.
Intermediate courts of appeals do not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction in
criminal law matters. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (limiting original habeas
jurisdiction of intermediate appellate courts to civil cases); Ex parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d
586, 588–89 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1994, orig. proceeding) (per curiam). That jurisdiction
instead rests with the Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, and the county courts. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts. 11.05, 11.08, 11.09; Ex parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d
at 588.
Consequently, we dismiss Bradley’s application for writ of habeas corpus for want
of jurisdiction.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte Patrick Bradley v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-patrick-bradley-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.