Ex parte Parker

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Ex parte Parker

263 So. 2d 695, 48 Ala. App. 239, 1972 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 894

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJune 13, 1972

Docket6 Div. 346

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 263 So. 2d 695 (Ex parte Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex parte Parker, 263 So. 2d 695, 48 Ala. App. 239, 1972 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 894 (Ala. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

This is an original proceeding seeking mandamus to review an order denying a pretrial motion to suppress certain evidence allegedly seized in execution of a claimed defective search warrant.

On oral argument it was pressed upon us that if we were to find that the circuit court should have suppressed the evidence then since the State had no other or additional proof to make out the case charged, the entire cause would be at an end.

In Ex parte Pickett, 46 Ala.App. 227, 239 So.2d 900, no such claim was made. An examination .of the Pickett record reveals that, except for the possibility that the magistrate who issued a search warrant took some of his proof from a policeman in a telephonic conversation, the proof to justify the search and seizure was prima facie adequate.

On rereading Pickett we consider its authority requires that the petition sub judice is due to be

Denied.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI