Ex parte Paget
This text of 18 F. Cas. 1000 (Ex parte Paget) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
decided, that as by the second and fourth sections these matters were made a bar to a final discharge and certificate, they ought to be interposed after the decree of bankruptcy; and that although this decree would divest the petitioner of all his property, and vest it in an assignee appointed by the court, for the benefit of all [1001]*1001his creditors equally, yet that (if the facts alleged were proved) the petitioner would he debarred of his discharge: In other words, that the petitioner would be subjected to the penalties of the act, but not have any of its benefits.
This case was decided some time ago; but Judge Handall's opinion having been lent to a friend, by whom it was mislaid, the reporter has been unable, till now. to report the case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 F. Cas. 1000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-paget-pennsylvaniad-1822.