Ex parte Pacheco

5 P.R. 339

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ex parte Pacheco. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 P.R. Dec. 165 →

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico·Decided February 20, 1904·No. No. 89·Published

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Quiñones,

after making the above statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the judgment appealed from are accepted.

In view of the legal provisions cited therein, we adjudge that we should affirm and do affirm said judgment, with costs against appellants.

[345]*345Justices Hernández, Figueras and MacLeary concurred. Mr. Justice Sulzbacher did not sit at tire Fearing of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Quiñones,

after making the above statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the judgment appealed from are accepted.

In view of the legal provisions cited therein, we adjudge that we should affirm and do affirm said judgment, with costs against appellants.

[345]*345Justices Hernández, Figueras and MacLeary concurred. Mr. Justice Sulzbacher did not sit at tire Fearing of this case.

Ex parte Pacheco, 5 P.R. 339 (prsupreme 1904).

Pincite

5 P.R. 339 (Ex parte Pacheco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.