Ex Parte Owens

1931 OK CR 74, 296 P. 1117, 50 Okla. Crim. 56, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 119
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ex Parte Owens. Read the opinion of the Court — 49 Okla. Crim. 445
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided February 7, 1931·No. No. A-8071.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an original proceeding in ha-beas corpus. The petitioner alleges that he is unlawfully restrained by the sheriff of Oklahoma county; that heretofore petitioner was charged before a committing magistrate with the crime of riot; a preliminary hearing was had, and petitioner was held for the action of the district court; that there is no evidence tending to prove probable cause to believe petitioner guilty of the offense charged. Attached to the petition is a transcript of the testimony taken before the committing magistrate. Prom a careful consideration of this evidence, we are constrained to find that there is no' substantial evidence to prove probable cause that petitioner is guilty of riot and that he should be discharged.

The writ is granted, and petitioner discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Owens, 1931 OK CR 74, 296 P. 1117, 50 Okla. Crim. 56, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 119 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

1931 OK CR 74 (Ex Parte Owens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.