Ex Parte Owens

1925 OK CR 137, 233 P. 1100, 29 Okla. Crim. 365, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 126
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 12, 1925
DocketNo. A-5443.
StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 137 (Ex Parte Owens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Owens, 1925 OK CR 137, 233 P. 1100, 29 Okla. Crim. 365, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 126 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an application of Eddie Owens, by his attorneys, for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that Eddie Owens is unlawfully restrained of his liberty and imprisoned in the county jail of Kay county by James Barker, sheriff, that he is so held under a commitment based upon a preliminary examination upon a complaint, wherein the petitioner is charged with the murder of John Askren, in Kay county, on the 26th day of September, 1924. Petitioner says that he is not guilty of the crime of murder as charged, and that the proof of his guilt is not evident nor the presumption thereof great. Attached to his petition is a transcript of the testimony taken on behalf of the state at the preliminary examination. The petitioner did not testify at the preliminary examination.

Upon the return day of the rule to show cause, a hearing was had in this court, and at that (time the petitioner testified in his own behalf. Upon consideration of the testimony taken at the preliminary examination in connection with the testimony of the petitioner here, this court holds that the facts shown are not such as will entitle the petitioner to bail. Upon an application for bail by writ of habeas corpus, after commitment for a capital offense by an examining magistrate, the burden is upon the petitioner to show facts sufficient to entitle him to bail, and in the opinion of this court the burden has not been met in this case. Ex parte Butler, 15 Okla. Cr. 111, 175 P. 132; In re Bean, 17 *366 Okla. Cr. 576, 190 P. 1091; Ex parte Hatcher, 22 Okla. Cr. 311, 211 P. 95.

The application of petitioner, Eddie Owens, is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Butler
1918 OK CR 136 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1918)
In Re Bean
1920 OK CR 144 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1920)
Ex Parte Hatcher
1922 OK CR 192 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1925 OK CR 137, 233 P. 1100, 29 Okla. Crim. 365, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-owens-oklacrimapp-1925.