Ex Parte Owen

137 So. 311, 223 Ala. 467
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided October 15, 1931·No. 8 Div. 338.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BROWN, J.

Refused charge 3 in Hudson v. State, 217 Ala. 479, 116 So. 800, identical with charge 5 in this case, was condemned because it justified the defendant in shooting the deceased, though he was not free from fault in bringing on the difficulty.

Charges 6 and 9 pretermit defendant’s duty to retreat. In Chaney’s Case, 178 Ala. 44, 59 So. 604, under the undisputed evidence in that case, the killing was in defendant’s place of business and he was under no duty to retreat.

This disposes of the questions presented, and the writ of certiorari will be denied.

Writ denied.

- ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Owen, 137 So. 311, 223 Ala. 467 (Ala. 1931).

137 So. 311 (Ex Parte Owen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rogers v. State
157 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)
Bragg v. State
183 So. 682 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1938)