Ex Parte Owen
This text of 137 So. 311 (Ex Parte Owen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Refused charge 3 in Hudson v. State, 217 Ala. 479, 116 So. 800, identical with charge 5 in this case, was condemned because it justified the defendant in shooting the deceased, though he was not free from fault in bringing on the difficulty.
Charges 6 and 9 pretermit defendant’s duty to retreat. In Chaney’s Case, 178 Ala. 44, 59 So. 604, under the undisputed evidence in that case, the killing was in defendant’s place of business and he was under no duty to retreat.
This disposes of the questions presented, and the writ of certiorari will be denied.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 So. 311, 223 Ala. 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-owen-ala-1931.