Ex Parte Overstreet

46 S.W. 929, 39 Tex. Crim. 468, 1898 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 152
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 15, 1898
DocketNo. 1509.
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 46 S.W. 929 (Ex Parte Overstreet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Overstreet, 46 S.W. 929, 39 Tex. Crim. 468, 1898 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 152 (Tex. 1898).

Opinion

DAVIDS OH, Judge.

The Assistant Attorney-General moves to dismiss this case because there is no proper transcript on file. The ground of the motion is predicated on the fact that the transcript is certified by the clerk, when it should have been certified by the judge. The habeas corpus proceeding, from which this is an appeal, was tried by the county judge, in vacation. When this is the case, under article 916 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the transcript must be certified by the judge who tried the cause. When the habeas corpus proceeding occurs in term time, it is certified by the clerk as other transcripts. Because the transcript is not certified by the judge as required by the statute, there is no ■proper record before us for our consideration, and the appeal is dismissed. See Ex Parte Malone, 35 Texas Crim. Rep., 297.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Turner
296 S.W. 295 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Ex Parte Lozano
225 S.W. 59 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Ex Parte Young
219 S.W. 1102 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Camp v. State
135 S.W. 146 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Ex Parte Brown
64 S.W. 249 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 S.W. 929, 39 Tex. Crim. 468, 1898 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-overstreet-texcrimapp-1898.