Ex Parte Oscar Ivan Calva-Cruz v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 17, 2023
Docket14-23-00172-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Oscar Ivan Calva-Cruz v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Oscar Ivan Calva-Cruz v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Oscar Ivan Calva-Cruz v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 17, 2023

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00172-CR

EX PARTE OSCAR IVAN CALVA-CRUZ

On Appeal from the 458th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 23-DCR-102423

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant was charged by indictment with possession of a controlled substance in an amount less than 1 gram. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115(b). On February 9, 2023, appellant filed a pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus seeking release for lack of probable cause. On February 23, 2023, the trial court denied appellant’s requested habeas corpus relief. On March 13, 2023, appellant filed a notice of appeal.

During the pendency of this appeal, appellant signed a plea agreement, and the trial court signed a judgment of conviction. A supplemental clerk’s record filed with this court contains the judgment of conviction. Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal as moot. We grant the motion.

The issues regarding appellant’s pre-trial habeas restraint have been rendered moot by entry of his plea of guilty to the underlying criminal offense. Saucedo v. State, 795 S.W.2d 8, 9 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1990, no writ). The longstanding rule in Texas regarding habeas corpus is that “where the premise of a habeas corpus application is destroyed by subsequent developments, the legal issues raised thereunder are rendered moot.” Id. (citing Ex parte Branch, 553 S.W.2d 380 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997)).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justice Jewell, Spain, and Wilson.

Do Not Publish – Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saucedo v. State
795 S.W.2d 8 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Ex Parte Branch
553 S.W.2d 380 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Oscar Ivan Calva-Cruz v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-oscar-ivan-calva-cruz-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.