Ex parte Northern Pacific R.

Supreme Court

Ex parte Northern Pacific R.

280 U.S. 513

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 14, 1929

DocketNo. 21, original

StatusPublished

This text of 280 U.S. 513 (Ex parte Northern Pacific R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex parte Northern Pacific R., 280 U.S. 513 (1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus, and the motion for leave to amend and supplement such petition, are granted.

A rule is directed to issue against the respondents, returnable on the first motion day following a period of 30 [514]*514days from this date, directing them to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue in this cause.

Messrs. Bruce Scott, H. H. Field, F. G. Dorety, M. S. Gunn, and Dennis F. Lyons for petitioners.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus, and the motion for leave to amend and supplement such petition, are granted.

A rule is directed to issue against the respondents, returnable on the first motion day following a period of 30 [514]*514days from this date, directing them to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue in this cause.

Messrs. Bruce Scott, H. H. Field, F. G. Dorety, M. S. Gunn, and Dennis F. Lyons for petitioners.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 U.S. 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-northern-pacific-r-scotus-1929.