Ex parte Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex parte Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

700 So. 2d 1199, 1997 Ala. LEXIS 355, 1997 WL 401291

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided July 18, 1997·No. 1961104·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

[1200]*1200ALMON, SHORES, KENNEDY, COOK, and BUTTS, JJ., concur. HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, HOUSTON, and SEE, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

[1200]*1200ALMON, SHORES, KENNEDY, COOK, and BUTTS, JJ., concur. HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, HOUSTON, and SEE, JJ., dissent.

Ex parte Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., 700 So. 2d 1199, 1997 Ala. LEXIS 355, 1997 WL 401291 (Ala. 1997).

Pincite

700 So. 2d 1199 (Ex parte Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related