Ex parte Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

210 So. 3d 585
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMarch 11, 2016
Docket1150434
StatusPublished

This text of 210 So. 3d 585 (Ex parte Norfolk Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Norfolk Southern Railway Co., 210 So. 3d 585 (Ala. 2016).

Opinion

MAIN, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion [204 So.3d 371]. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

MOORE, C.J., and BOLIN, MURDOCK, and BRYAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horsley v. Horsley
280 So. 2d 155 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1973)
Putnam v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
204 So. 3d 371 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 So. 3d 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-norfolk-southern-railway-co-ala-2016.