Ex Parte Nolden

360 S.W.2d 151, 172 Tex. Crim. 553, 1962 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1081
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 6, 1962·No. 34657·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The relator is confined in the penitentiary under a life sentence assessed by a jury on his plea of guilty in February 1938, for the offense of rape.

By writ of habeas corpus presented in accordance with Art. 119, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P., he seeks his release on the ground that he was denied his constitutionally guaranteed right to due process of law.

Hearing was had before a District Judge at the conclusion of which the writ was granted and made returnable before this Court.

There are no undisputed facts which sustain the relator’s contention that the conviction is void. Under the holdings of this Court, the conviction may not be attacked as void on the sole ground that the defendant was under 17 years of age at the time of his trial. The right of an accused under 17 years of age to be tried as a juvenile may be waived. Ex parte White, 50 Tex.Cr.R. 473, 98 S.W. 850; Fifer v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 282, 234 S.W. 409; Ex parte Munoz, Tex.Cr.App., 209 S.W.2d 767.

The relief prayed for is denied.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Nolden, 360 S.W.2d 151, 172 Tex. Crim. 553, 1962 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1081 (Tex. 1962).

360 S.W.2d 151 (Ex Parte Nolden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bannister v. State
552 S.W.2d 124 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1977)
In RE SHEPPARD v. Rhay
440 P.2d 422 (Washington Supreme Court, 1968)
State v. Superior Court of Pima County
436 P.2d 948 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1968)
Whittington v. Gaither
272 F. Supp. 507 (N.D. Texas, 1967)