Ex parte Nolden
This text of 172 Tex. Crim. 553 (Ex parte Nolden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The relator is confined in the penitentiary under a life sentence assessed by a jury on his plea of guilty in February 1938, for the offense of rape.
By writ of habeas corpus presented in accordance with Art. 119, V.A.C.C.P., he seeks his release on the ground that he was denied his constitutionally guaranteed right to due process of law.
Hearing was had before a District Judge at the conclusion of which the writ was granted and made returnable before this Court.
There are no undisputed facts which sustain the relator’s contention that the conviction is void. Under the holdings of this Court, the conviction may not be attacked as void on the sole ground that the defendant was under 17 years of age at the time of his trial. The right of an accused under 17 years of age to be tried as a juvenile may be waived. Ex parte White, 50 Texas Cr. Rep. 473, 98 S.W. 850; Fifer v. State, 90 Texas Cr. Rep. 282, 234 S.W. 409; Ex parte Munoz, 209 S.W. 2d 767.
The relief prayed for is denied.
Opinion approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 Tex. Crim. 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-nolden-texcrimapp-1962.