Ex Parte Nolan

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ex Parte Nolan

1925 OK CR 120, 233 P. 787, 29 Okla. Crim. 340, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 113

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 7, 1925

DocketNo. A-5262.

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 120 (Ex Parte Nolan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Nolan, 1925 OK CR 120, 233 P. 787, 29 Okla. Crim. 340, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 113 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is a petition for writ of habeas corpus whereby Michael Nolan seeks to obtain his discharge from the county jail of Grant county on the ground that he is unlawfully and without authority of law restrained of his liberty by Frank Hamilton, sheriff, that the cause of his restraint and confinement to the best information and knowledge of petitioner is said sheriff detains and holds him therein without any process or authority whatsoever for so doing.

The petition is not verified, and it is not alleged that an application for habeas corpus has heretofore been filed in the district court of Grant county as required by the rules of this court in cases of this kind.

For the above-stated reasons, the Attorney General moved to dismiss the cause, which motion was and is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case is a petition for writ of habeas corpus whereby Michael Nolan seeks to obtain his discharge from the county jail of Grant county on the ground that he is unlawfully and without authority of law restrained of his liberty by Frank Hamilton, sheriff, that the cause of his restraint and confinement to the best information and knowledge of petitioner is said sheriff detains and holds him therein without any process or authority whatsoever for so doing.

The petition is not verified, and it is not alleged that an application for habeas corpus has heretofore been filed in the district court of Grant county as required by the rules of this court in cases of this kind.

For the above-stated reasons, the Attorney General moved to dismiss the cause, which motion was and is sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK CR 120, 233 P. 787, 29 Okla. Crim. 340, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-nolan-oklacrimapp-1925.