Ex Parte Noel Valdez Andrade
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-19-00234-CR
EX PARTE NOEL VALDEZ ANDRADE
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
June 25, 2019
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ.
As a pro se, Noel Valdez Andrade again petitions this Court for a writ of habeas
corpus. This time, however, he does so under article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure and believes his felony conviction improper because 1) trial counsel allegedly
was ineffective and 2) new evidence would allegedly illustrate that the police “planted” the
drugs found in his car. We dismiss.
Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure establishes a means
through which one may obtain “relief from a felony judgment imposing a penalty other
than death.” TEX. CODE. CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 1 (West 2015). Yet, the authority
to award such relief under that statute lies within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals. In re Nottingham, No. 07-19-00201-CV, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 5052, at *3–4 (Tex. App.—Amarillo June 18, 2019 orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); Ex parte
Bellar, No. 07-19-00056-CR, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 861, at *1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Feb.
6, 2019, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
Because this Court is not the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, we lack the authority to
substantively entertain Andrade’s application for relief.
Andrade’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07 of the Texas
Code of Criminal Procedure is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex Parte Noel Valdez Andrade (Ex Parte Noel Valdez Andrade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.