Ex parte Nicola

218 U.S. 668, 31 S. Ct. 228, 54 L. Ed. 1203, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 2069
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 5, 1910·No. No. 8·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Petition for a writ of mandamus denied, rule discharged, and petition dismissed, on authority of Tobin, Petitioner, 214 U. S. 507.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Nicola, 218 U.S. 668, 31 S. Ct. 228, 54 L. Ed. 1203, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 2069 (1910).

218 U.S. 668 (Ex parte Nicola) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mestre v. Russell & Co.
279 F. 44 (First Circuit, 1922)
Paolicelli v. Samuels
278 F. 629 (E.D. New York, 1921)
Earles v. Germain Co.
265 F. 715 (S.D. Alabama, 1920)
Sanders v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
261 F. 697 (N.D. Georgia, 1919)
Matarazzo v. Hustis
256 F. 882 (N.D. New York, 1919)
Guaranty Trust Co. v. McCabe
250 F. 699 (Second Circuit, 1918)
Keating v. Pennsylvania Co.
245 F. 155 (N.D. Ohio, 1917)
Doherty v. Smith
233 F. 132 (S.D. New York, 1915)
Lehigh Valley Coal Co. v. Yensavage
218 F. 547 (Second Circuit, 1914)
Jackson v. William Kenefick Co.
233 F. 130 (S.D. New York, 1913)