Ex Parte Newsome

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ex Parte Newsome

1931 OK CR 108, 296 P. 1116, 50 Okla. Crim. 133, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 116

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 6, 1931

DocketNo. A-8095.

StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 108 (Ex Parte Newsome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Newsome, 1931 OK CR 108, 296 P. 1116, 50 Okla. Crim. 133, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 116 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

PEB CUBIAM.

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. Petitioners allege that they are held by the sheriff of Comanche county under a finding of probable cause and a commitment from a magistrate upon a preliminary wherein petitioners were charged with murder, that there is no evidence whatever that petitioners had any connection with the murder charged, and that they are entitled to be discharged.

*134 The record shows that at the time charged one Mora was hilled at a resort where petitioners and one Bill Broach ' were present, engaged in what appeared to be a drinking carouse, that the killing was done by Broach in his necessary self-defense, and that he was hefLd for the district court by the committing magistrate. Broach is not seeking release on bail or otherwise. We deem it unnecessary to further refer to' the testimony. An examination of the transcript convinces us that the state has not been able to present more than a bare scintilla of evidence connecting defendants with the commission of the crime charged, and that they are entitled to be discharged.

The writ is awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEB CUBIAM.

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. Petitioners allege that they are held by the sheriff of Comanche county under a finding of probable cause and a commitment from a magistrate upon a preliminary wherein petitioners were charged with murder, that there is no evidence whatever that petitioners had any connection with the murder charged, and that they are entitled to be discharged.

*134 The record shows that at the time charged one Mora was hilled at a resort where petitioners and one Bill Broach ' were present, engaged in what appeared to be a drinking carouse, that the killing was done by Broach in his necessary self-defense, and that he was hefLd for the district court by the committing magistrate. Broach is not seeking release on bail or otherwise. We deem it unnecessary to further refer to' the testimony. An examination of the transcript convinces us that the state has not been able to present more than a bare scintilla of evidence connecting defendants with the commission of the crime charged, and that they are entitled to be discharged.

The writ is awarded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1931 OK CR 108, 296 P. 1116, 50 Okla. Crim. 133, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-newsome-oklacrimapp-1931.