Ex Parte N.C.

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 19, 2014
• Docket: 10-14-00102-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00102-CV

EX PARTE N.C.

From the 12th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 26744

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N.C., an inmate, appeals the trial court’s order denying his petition for

expunction. In this appeal, N.C. has filed an affidavit (declaration) of inability to pay

costs.

Effective January 1, 2012, Chapter 14 was amended to apply to an action,

including an appeal or an original proceeding, brought by an inmate in a district,

county, justice of the peace, or small claims court, or an appellate court in which an

affidavit of indigence is also filed. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 14.002(a) (West

Supp. 2013) (emphasis added); Douglas v. Turner, ___ S.W.3d ___, ___, 2013 WL 2245653,

at *1 (Tex. App.—Waco May 9, 2013, no pet. h.). Chapter 14’s requirements thus apply when an inmate files an appeal or an original proceeding. Douglas, ___ S.W.3d at ___,

2013 WL 2245653, at *1.

Section 14.004(a) requires the inmate to file an affidavit or declaration “relating to

previous filings” in which the inmate must detail all previous actions filed pro se, other

than a suit under the Family Code, accompanied by a certified copy of the inmate’s

account statement. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 14.004(a) (West Supp. 2013).

The statement must “reflect the balance of the account at the time the claim is filed and

activity in the account during the six months preceding the date on which the claim is

filed.” Id. § 14.004(c) (West Supp. 2013); 14.006(f) (West 2002). The filings required by

chapter 14 are “an essential part of the process by which courts review inmate

litigation.” Douglas, ___ S.W.3d at ___, 2013 WL 2245653, at *1 (citing Hickson v. Moya,

926 S.W.2d 397, 399 (Tex. App.—Waco 1996, no writ)).

The failure to file the affidavit or declaration “relating to previous filings” can

result in dismissal without notice or hearing. Id. (citing Amir-Sharif v. Mason, 243

S.W.3d 854, 857 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, no pet.); Thompson v. Rodriguez, 99 S.W.3d 328,

329-30 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2003, no pet.); and Jackson v. Tex. Dep't of Crim. Just., 28

S.W.3d 811, 814 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2000, pet. denied)). Furthermore, when the

inmate fails to comply with the affidavit requirements, the court may assume that the

current action is substantially similar to one previously filed by the inmate and is thus

frivolous. Id. (citing Altschul v. TDCJ - Inmate Trust Fund Div., No. 10-11-00084-CV, 2012

WL 851681, at *1, 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 2025, *3 (Tex. App.—Waco Mar. 14, 2012, pet.

Ex parte N.C. Page 2 denied) (mem. op.); Bell v. Tex. Dep't of Crim. Just., 962 S.W.2d 156, 158 (Tex. App.—

Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, pet. denied)).

In this appeal, N.C. did not file an affidavit or declaration “relating to previous

filings.” We thus dismiss as frivolous this appeal without notice.1 Id., ___ S.W.3d at

___, 2013 WL 2245653, at *2; see also Hickman v. Tex. Dep't of Crim. Just., No. 13-12-00437-

CV, 2013 WL 3770916, at *3 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Jul. 18, 2013, no pet. h.) (mem.

op.). N.C.’s pending motions are dismissed as moot.

REX D. DAVIS Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed as frivolous Opinion delivered and filed June 19, 2014 [CV06]

1 A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment or order of this Court is rendered. TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by the Texas Supreme Court, a petition for review must be filed with the Texas Supreme Court clerk within 45 days after either the date the court of appeals’ judgment was rendered or the date the last ruling on all timely motions for rehearing was made by the court of appeals. TEX. R. APP. P. 53.7(a).

Ex parte N.C. Page 3