Ex Parte N. F. Christian

268 S.W. 160, 99 Tex. Crim. 99, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 800
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 21, 1924
DocketNo. 8582.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 268 S.W. 160 (Ex Parte N. F. Christian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte N. F. Christian, 268 S.W. 160, 99 Tex. Crim. 99, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 800 (Tex. 1924).

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

This is an appeal from the district court of Jefferson County remanding appellant to custody. He had obtained *100 a hearing by habeas corpus before the district court, asserting the invalidity of his confinement.

There appears in the record no notice of appeal given from the judgment of the court remanding appellant. In order to manifest dissatisfaction of the accused with the order and judgment of the trial court, and to set forth his desire that an appeal be taken, it is uniformly necessary that notice of appeal must be given. This is true in appeals in habeas corpus cases. Ex parte Barrier, 17 Texas Crim. App., 585.

The appeal will be dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Maple
33 S.W.2d 734 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Bryson v. State
20 S.W.2d 1047 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Ex Parte Moore
3 S.W.2d 86 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 S.W. 160, 99 Tex. Crim. 99, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-n-f-christian-texcrimapp-1924.