Ex Parte Montgomery Merrell

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 5, 2005
Docket02-05-00070-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Montgomery Merrell (Ex Parte Montgomery Merrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Montgomery Merrell, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

MERRELL V. STATE

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NOS. 2-05-070-CR

        2-05-071-CR

EX PARTE

MONTGOMERY MERRELL

------------

FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1)

Appellant Montgomery Merrell appeals from the trial court’s denial of his pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus, which complains of an excessive bail amount. (footnote: 2)  Because appellant pled guilty and received deferred adjudication while this appeal was pending, we dismiss the appeal as moot. (footnote: 3)   See Ex parte Laday , 594 S.W.2d 102, 104 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980) (holding that defendant on deferred adjudication is entitled to bail pending an adjudication hearing); Trammell v. State , 529 S.W.2d 528, 529-30 (Tex. Crim. App. 1975) (holding that pretrial bond obtained before defendant placed on misdemeanor probation (footnote: 4) did not secure appearance at proceedings to revoke probation and therefore surety could not be liable on it); Reed v. State , 702 S.W.2d 738, 741 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1985, no pet.) (holding that surety is not liable on pretrial bond after defendant placed on deferred adjudication).

                                         PER CURIAM

PANEL F:   LIVINGSTON, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  May 5, 2005

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2:

Appellant complained that he was not able to make bail in the amount set by the trial court.

3:

Appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw the appeal, but it was not signed by appellant because, according to appellant’s counsel, appellant  is somewhere in Mexico.  Thus, we deny the motion to withdraw the notice of appeal because it has not been signed by appellant and because we are dismissing the appeal as moot.   See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

4:

Under prior law, misdemeanor probation was not a final conviction until revoked.   See Act of May 28, 1979, 66th Leg., R.S., ch. 654, § 1, 1979 Tex. Gen. Laws 1514, 1518-19, repealed by Act of May 21, 1985, 69th Leg., R.S., ch. 427, § 3, 1985 Tex. Gen. Laws 1531, 1555.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Laday
594 S.W.2d 102 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Reed v. State
702 S.W.2d 738 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Trammel v. State
529 S.W.2d 528 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Montgomery Merrell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-montgomery-merrell-texapp-2005.