Ex Parte Mobile Light R. Co.

75 So. 940, 200 Ala. 192, 1917 Ala. LEXIS 367
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 31, 1917
Docket1 Div. 981.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 75 So. 940 (Ex Parte Mobile Light R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Mobile Light R. Co., 75 So. 940, 200 Ala. 192, 1917 Ala. LEXIS 367 (Ala. 1917).

Opinion

SAYRE, J.

[1, 2] This application having been submitted to the whole court, it is adjudged and ordered that the petition be dismissed for the reason that it was not filed within 15 days of the overruling of petitioner’s application for rehearing in the Court of Appeals as required by rule 42 (175 Ala. xx). The court is of opinion that the act of September 15, 1915 (Acts, p. 606), has no effect upon the operation of the rule.

‘The writer, considering beforehand' and doubting the propriety of .the decision thus established (for which reason he brought the case to a conference of all the judges), had prepared an opinion on the meritorious question presented by the petition, and, sustaining the conclusion reached by the Court of Appeals, preferred to put the result on that ground. He now acquiesces in the court’s disposition of the matter.

Petition for certiorari dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. State ex rel. Borders
107 So. 2d 890 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Morrow v. State
97 So. 2d 547 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1957)
Ex Parte Ewart-Brewer Motor Co.
99 So. 836 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 So. 940, 200 Ala. 192, 1917 Ala. LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-mobile-light-r-co-ala-1917.