Ex Parte Mitchell

196 S.W. 540, 81 Tex. Crim. 517, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 188

• Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 20, 1917
• Docket: No. 4567.
• Status: Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

This is an appeal from a habeas corpus hearing denying bail.

Mr. Mitchell was indicted by the grand jury of Knox County, charging him with murder in that county. By proper order of the District Court of that county the venue of the case was changed to Baylor County. Both counties are in the same district, and Judge J. H. Milam, the judge of the judicial district, of which both are a part. After the venue had been so changed, Mr. Mitchell applied for a writ of habeas corpus, seeking bail. Judge Milam granted the writ, and had the trial in Baylor County, and the order denying bail was made in that county.

The Assistant Attorney General has made a motion to. dismiss the appeal because the district judge had no jurisdiction to hear and decide the cause of habeas corpus in Baylor County.

The writ was properly granted but the statute (art. 167, C. C. P.) requires the writ be made returnable in the county where the alleged offense has been committed. This statute has uniformly been held to be mandatory as shown by the decisions noted in 2 Vernon’s Grim. Stats., p. 107.

■ It is therefore the order of this court that the judgment of Judge Milam refusing bail will be set aside and the writ of habeas corpus will be made returnable in Knox County when Judge Milam will designate the time of bearing in that county and make such orders as to notice and witnesses as will secure a speedy hearing.

Ordered accordingly.

Reversed with instructions.