Ex Parte Miller
This text of 16 S.W.2d 123 (Ex Parte Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The appellant is indicted for robbery by assault with firearms. Though controverted the evidence is sufficient to show that the appellant committed the robbery. On the habeas corpus hearing he was denied bail. There was no violence used, and there are no attending aggravating circumstances such as would render probable the infliction of the death penalty. It is believed that he should have been allowed bail. The case is not unlike that of Ex parte Vermillion, 280 S. W. Rep. 771.
The judgment denying bail is reversed and bail granted in the sum of $10,000.00.
Reversed and bail granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 S.W.2d 123, 112 Tex. Crim. 229, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-miller-texcrimapp-1929.