Ex Parte Michael Tucker

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: November 20, 2002
• Docket: 04-02-00486-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

No. 04-02-00486-CR EX PARTE Michael TUCKER From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2001-CR-4896 Honorable Sam Katz, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Alma L. López, Justice

Catherine Stone, Justice

Paul W. Green, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 20, 2002

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal seeking to appeal the trial court's order denying his writ of habeas corpus. Because our record does not contain a signed written order, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Elliott v. State, 412 S.W.2d 320, 320 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967); Nikrasch v. State, 698 S.W.2d 443, 450 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1985, no writ). On October 7, 2002, we struck appellant's pro se response because appellant is represented by counsel on appeal and is not entitled to hybrid representation. Rudd v.

State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Appellant's counsel has not responded to our order. The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DO NOT PUBLISH