Ex Parte Michael Omar Lopez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 23, 2022
Docket04-22-00306-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Michael Omar Lopez (Ex Parte Michael Omar Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Michael Omar Lopez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

FILE COPY

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 23, 2022

No. 04-22-00306-CR

EX PARTE Michael Omar LOPEZ,

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012CR1981-W5 Honorable Melisa C. Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant, proceeding pro se, seeks to appeal the denial of his post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to article 11.07. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a). Under the exclusive procedure outlined in article 11.07, only the convicting trial court and the Court of Criminal Appeals have jurisdiction to review the merits of a post- conviction habeas petition; there is no role for the intermediate courts of appeals in the statutory scheme. Id. art. 11.07, § 5 (providing “[a]fter conviction the procedure outlined in this Act shall be exclusive and any other proceeding shall be void and of no force and effect in discharging the prisoner”). Only the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to grant post-conviction release from confinement for persons with a felony conviction. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3; Hoang v. State, 872 S.W.2d 694, 697 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); In re Stone, 26 S.W.3d 568, 569 (Tex. App.—Waco 2000, orig. proceeding). The intermediate courts of appeals have no jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (orig. proceeding); see In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Ngo, No. 02-16-00425-CR, 2016 WL 7405836, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Dec. 22, 2016) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction).

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to show cause in writing by July 8, 2022 why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of June, 2022. FILE COPY

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Coronado
980 S.W.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Board of Pardons & Paroles Ex Rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District
910 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Van Hoang v. State
872 S.W.2d 694 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1993)
in Re James H. Stone, Sr.
26 S.W.3d 568 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Michael Omar Lopez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-michael-omar-lopez-texapp-2022.