Ex Parte Michael Gamez v. the State of Texas
This text of Ex Parte Michael Gamez v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Michael Gamez v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 20, 2025
NO. 03-25-00146-CR
Ex parte Michael Gamez
APPEAL FROM THE 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND ELLIS REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ELLIS
This is an appeal from the order denying Gamez’s pretrial habeas application entered by the
district court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there
was reversible error in the district court’s order. Therefore, the Court reverses the district court’s
order and remands the case for further proceedings to set the bond—including all costs
associated with conditions of release imposed by the district court—at a total amount that the
record shows Gamez can afford to pay. Because Gamez is indigent and unable to pay costs, no
adjudication of costs is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00147-CR
APPEAL FROM THE 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND ELLIS REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ELLIS
This is an appeal from the order denying Gamez’s pretrial habeas application entered by the
district court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there
was reversible error in the district court’s order. Therefore, the Court reverses the district court’s
order and remands the case for further proceedings to set the bond—including all costs
associated with conditions of release imposed by the district court—at a total amount that the
record shows Gamez can afford to pay. Because Gamez is indigent and unable to pay costs, no
adjudication of costs is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00154-CR
APPEAL FROM THE 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND ELLIS REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ELLIS
This is an appeal from the order denying Gamez’s pretrial habeas application entered by the
district court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there
was reversible error in the district court’s order. Therefore, the Court reverses the district court’s
order and remands the case for further proceedings to set the bond—including all costs
associated with conditions of release imposed by the district court—at a total amount that the
record shows Gamez can afford to pay. Because Gamez is indigent and unable to pay costs, no
adjudication of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte Michael Gamez v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-michael-gamez-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.