Ex parte McPheters

1 La. Ann. 132
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1846
StatusPublished

This text of 1 La. Ann. 132 (Ex parte McPheters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte McPheters, 1 La. Ann. 132 (La. 1846).

Opinion

EN. and A. N. Ogden, for James McPheters, moved for a rule on the i Judge of the Court of Probates of New Orleans, to show cause why a mandamus should not be issued, commanding him to grant an order directing the executor of one Scoville, to file in court, within a limited period, a statement of his condition as executor. The rule having been granted, Bermudez, Judge, showed cause against the application, contending that the Hon. George Eustis, Pierre A. Bost, George B. King and Thomas Slidell, by whom the rule was granted, are not legally justices of the Supreme Court of this State, the constitution of 1845, under which they hold their appointments, being null and void, for reasons stated at length. A mandamus was granted, directing the judge to make the order prayed for..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 La. Ann. 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-mcpheters-la-1846.