Ex Parte McLaughlin

California Court of Appeal

Ex Parte McLaughlin

116 P. 684, 16 Cal. App. 270, 1911 Cal. App. LEXIS 141

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 15, 1911

DocketCrim. No. 200.

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 116 P. 684 (Ex Parte McLaughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte McLaughlin, 116 P. 684, 16 Cal. App. 270, 1911 Cal. App. LEXIS 141 (Cal. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Petitioner was arrested, tried and convicted of the crime of vagrancy. The affidavit of complaint upon which the warrant of arrest was issued, and upon which he was tried, charged that the defendant at Bakersfield, etc., “did then and there have no visible means of livelihood, and then and there did wander about the streets of the said city of Bakersfield at late and unusual hours of the night.” The question presented, therefore, is, Does such a complaint state a public offense? By subdivision 6 of section 647, Penal *271 Code, one of the definitions of a vagrant is: “Every person who wanders about the streets at late or unusual hours of the night without any visible or lawful business.” As we construe this subdivision, the words “visible or lawful business” must be held as referring to the reason why such person is roaming the streets, rather than any business or avocation in life from which support is derived. In other words, the offense is complete under subdivision 6 if, without good or sufficient reason, one roams at late or unusual hours of the night, and he is a vagrant without reference to his means of livelihood or vocation. This affidavit of complaint does not negative the fact that a reason or necessity existed which called him upon the street at a late hour of the night, but merely that he was so roaming, and for aught that appears in the affidavit of complaint, he may have had a legitimate and proper reason for being upon the streets at the time complained of.

We are of opinion that no offense is stated under the purview of this section, and the prisoner should be discharged; and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Petitioner was arrested, tried and convicted of the crime of vagrancy. The affidavit of complaint upon which the warrant of arrest was issued, and upon which he was tried, charged that the defendant at Bakersfield, etc., “did then and there have no visible means of livelihood, and then and there did wander about the streets of the said city of Bakersfield at late and unusual hours of the night.” The question presented, therefore, is, Does such a complaint state a public offense? By subdivision 6 of section 647, Penal *271 Code, one of the definitions of a vagrant is: “Every person who wanders about the streets at late or unusual hours of the night without any visible or lawful business.” As we construe this subdivision, the words “visible or lawful business” must be held as referring to the reason why such person is roaming the streets, rather than any business or avocation in life from which support is derived. In other words, the offense is complete under subdivision 6 if, without good or sufficient reason, one roams at late or unusual hours of the night, and he is a vagrant without reference to his means of livelihood or vocation. This affidavit of complaint does not negative the fact that a reason or necessity existed which called him upon the street at a late hour of the night, but merely that he was so roaming, and for aught that appears in the affidavit of complaint, he may have had a legitimate and proper reason for being upon the streets at the time complained of.

We are of opinion that no offense is stated under the purview of this section, and the prisoner should be discharged; and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 P. 684, 16 Cal. App. 270, 1911 Cal. App. LEXIS 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-mclaughlin-calctapp-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack