Ex parte McKissack

107 Ala. 493
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1894·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

If the bond for the attachment had become insufficient by reason of the matters stated in the motion to dismiss the suit, it rested within the sound discretion of the circuit court to entertain the motion to dismiss, or to refuse it, putting the defendants to a plea in abatement, if they would avail themselves of the insufficiency of the bond. The exercise of the discretion cannot be controlled hv mandamus. 2 Brick. Dig., 241, §§ 21,22. If a plea in abatement had been resorted to, and the plea pronounced insufficient, the judgment of the court would be capable of revision on appeal. When full relief can be had by appeal, that remedy must be pursued. Mandamus lies only where there is a specific legal right, and there is no other specific legal remedy adequate to its enforcement. Ex parte S. & N. Ala. R. R. Co. 65 Ala. 599.

The application for mandamus must be overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte McKissack, 107 Ala. 493 (Ala. 1894).

107 Ala. 493 (Ex parte McKissack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melvin v. Scowley
104 So. 817 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)
Ex Parte Jackson
103 So. 558 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)
State v. Booth
59 P. 553 (Utah Supreme Court, 1899)