Ex parte McDonald

376 S.W.2d 837, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 910
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 1, 1964
DocketNo. 36726
StatusPublished

This text of 376 S.W.2d 837 (Ex parte McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte McDonald, 376 S.W.2d 837, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 910 (Tex. 1964).

Opinion

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order entered in a habeas corpus proceeding remanding the petitioner to custody for extradition.

Governor Connally honored the requisition of the Governor of Arkansas for the petitioner’s arrest and return to that state to answer the charge of uttering a forged instrument.

The information, as well as the supporting papers, clearly shows that the petitioner is not substantially charged with “uttering a forged instrument.” The charge against the petitioner is violation of the Arkansas Hot Check Law, which is quite similar to the Texas Statute relating to the uttering of a worthless check.

The judgment remanding the petitioner is reversed and the petitioner is ordered discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
376 S.W.2d 837, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-mcdonald-texcrimapp-1964.