Ex Parte McDonald
This text of 437 So. 2d 1342 (Ex Parte McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Certiorari was granted to resolve an apparent conflict between the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals in this case and the opinion of this Court in Ex Parte Vaughn,
The facts of this case are fully stated in the opinion of the court below. After reviewing that opinion and the pertinent authorities, this Court has concluded that the dissenting opinion of Harris, J., states the proper rule of review of such petitions. Accordingly, that opinion is hereby adopted as the opinion of this Court. The judgment is reversed and the case remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals with directions to remand the cause to the trial court to determine whether, under the petition, the petitioner is entitled to a new trial.
REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES and SHORES, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
437 So. 2d 1342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-mcdonald-ala-1983.