Ex Parte McCallan

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ex Parte McCallan

175 S.W. 1067, 76 Tex. Crim. 509, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 434

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 21, 1915·No. No. 3536.·Published

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

Relator was convicted of a misdemeanor in the County Court of Gregg County. He appealed the case to'this court and it was affirmed. (McCallan v. State, 76 Texas Crim. Rep., 353, 174 S. W. Rep., 611.) Every question raised on this application for habeas corpus was passed on in the opinion by this court on the former appeal, and we do not deem it necessary to do so again, but merely refer to that opinion. We can not understand why the County Court entertained jurisdiction of the writ when the questions raised, and all the questions raised, were passed on in the former opinion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARPER, Judge.

Relator was convicted of a misdemeanor in the County Court of Gregg County. He appealed the case to'this court and it was affirmed. (McCallan v. State, 76 Texas Crim. Rep., 353, 174 S. W. Rep., 611.) Every question raised on this application for habeas corpus was passed on in the opinion by this court on the former appeal, and we do not deem it necessary to do so again, but merely refer to that opinion. We can not understand why the County Court entertained jurisdiction of the writ when the questions raised, and all the questions raised, were passed on in the former opinion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Ex Parte McCallan, 175 S.W. 1067, 76 Tex. Crim. 509, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 434 (Tex. 1915).

Pincite

175 S.W. 1067 (Ex Parte McCallan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related