Ex Parte Matthews

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex Parte Matthews

724 So. 2d 1143, 1998 Ala. LEXIS 232, 1998 WL 544943

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided August 28, 1998·No. 1971157·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The Court of Criminal Appeals granted in part the defendant's petition for the writ of mandamus. State v. Matthews,724 So.2d 1140 (Ala.Cr.App. 1998) (on application for rehearing). Pursuant to Rule 21 (e)(3), Ala. R. App. P., this Court has treated the defendant's request for the writ of mandamus as a petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 39, Ala. R. App. P., and has granted review. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, ALMON, SHORES, KENNEDY, COOK, SEE, and LYONS, JJ., concur.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court of Criminal Appeals granted in part the defendant's petition for the writ of mandamus. State v. Matthews,724 So.2d 1140 (Ala.Cr.App. 1998) (on application for rehearing). Pursuant to Rule 21 (e)(3), Ala. R. App. P., this Court has treated the defendant's request for the writ of mandamus as a petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 39, Ala. R. App. P., and has granted review. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, ALMON, SHORES, KENNEDY, COOK, SEE, and LYONS, JJ., concur.

*Page 1

Ex Parte Matthews, 724 So. 2d 1143, 1998 Ala. LEXIS 232, 1998 WL 544943 (Ala. 1998).

Pincite

724 So. 2d 1143 (Ex Parte Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related